Should Florida adopt the MPT?

The Florida Bar Exam currently consists of two parts: one part written by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners and the second part, the Multistate Bar Exam, written by the National Conference of Bar Examiners. Applicants must also earn a score that Florida considers passing on the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam.

The Multistate Bar Exam consists of 200 multiple choice questions administered in two three-hour sessions. The Florida Bar exam consists of three hours of essay questions followed by 100 multiple choice questions.

The National Conference of Bar Examiners offers the Uniform Bar Exam, which is used by 36 states and territories. The Uniform Bar Exam (UBE) consists of the MBE, which is part of the Florida Bar Exam, and two additional portions: the Multistate Essay Exam (MEE) and the Multistate Performance Test (MPT). So, generally speaking, all jurisdictions have some combination of essay and multiple choice questions, but there is variation across the country on the use of the MPT or similar examination format.

Now that the background has been established, the question is whether the Florida Bar Exam, consisting of just 300 multiple choice questions and some essays, can be used to determine whether a law school graduate is competent to practice law. My opinion, along with many others, is no, the exam does not separate those who are competent from those who are not. Some argue that the exam is simply a barrier to enter practice to control the number of lawyers admitted at one time. Aside from the fact that the exam scores are scaled, the exam requires test takers to memorize portions of Florida law and regurgitate them back to exam graders while sprinkling in some application of those rules. A newly admitted lawyer may or may not have the ability to explain the law to clients, make informed choices on behalf of clients, advocate for clients, or really do anything other than recite rehearsed rule statements and skeleton essay outlines.

So, how can bar examiners measure an applicant's ability to actually apply a client's facts to the law and come to a conclusion of how to proceed? The National Conference of Bar Examiners presents: the Multistate Performance Test. On the MPT, applicants are given a file with documents relating to a client. The file can include deposition transcripts, pleadings, contracts, notes, and other documents one would expect to find in a case file. Applicants are also provided with a library consisting of statutes, case law, regulations, and rules. Not all the materials in the file or library may be relevant to the question presented, which challenges applicants to determine what is relevant to answer the question. Applicants then prepare a memorandum answering the question presented.

This format of exam provides test takers with a task that they will likely be presented with early on in practice and assesses the ability to apply an area of law (not memorized for the rest of the exam) to new and unique facts. As a taker of the upcoming July 2024 bar exam, I am glad I do not have to worry about the unpredictability of the MPT. But in thinking of the public interest, the state needs to ensure that all lawyers are adequately prepared practice law.

Remote work for a new lawyer? Not recommended.

    Once a new lawyer gets a job, the new lawyer should focus on getting the necessary mentorship not necessarily the perks that can come with the job. As a new lawyer, you don't know what you don't know and normally, most new lawyers don't know how to practice law. Therefore a fully remote position as a new lawyer would stifle career and knowledge development for new lawyers. 

    Fully remote jobs would also stymie networking and face recognition which are vital for new lawyers. An in-office job would allow a new lawyer to become recognizable to other lawyers who have cases with the law firm, clients and anyone who stops by. No one 'stops by' in a remote position. 

    A lot of law firms went remote during the pandemic and now that they are coming back to in-office work, there has been a lot of backlash and resistance. I think some people benefit from in-office work and new lawyers would definitely also benefit. Once a lawyer becomes more knowledgeable about the work and has climbed up the trust tree where other lawyers can be confident of that lawyer's work and recording of hours, then a lawyer can transition into a hybrid workspace. 

How to Have a Successful Mediation

Mediation is an important part of law practice. It is often a much needed resolution that helps cases settlement before having to have a long, expensive and time sucking trial. Mediation is also a form of collaboration of opposing parties, to come to a successful agreed upon decision for the sake of both clients. Mediation is a skill, like negotiation, and one that is honed over time by doing real life mediations. However, there are some tips and tricks to having a successful mediation, as outlined below. Anyone can benefit from these helpful tricks, aided by the use of AI. 

1. Choose the right mediator: It is important to select a mediator who is experienced and well-qualified to handle the specific issues at hand. A neutral and impartial mediator is essential for a successful mediation process.

2. Prepare in advance: It is important for all parties involved in the mediation to come prepared with relevant information, documents, and desired outcomes. Discuss with your mediator regarding any preparatory steps that need to be taken before the mediation session.

3. Clearly outline the issues: Clearly define and outline the issues that need to be addressed during the mediation process. This will help keep the discussion on track and ensure that all parties are focusing on finding a resolution.

4. Listen actively: It is important to actively listen to the other party's perspective and concerns during the mediation process. By showing empathy and understanding, you can create a more collaborative and constructive environment for resolving differences.

5. Communicate effectively: Communication is key to a successful mediation. Clearly and concisely express your own viewpoints, needs, and concerns while also being open to hearing and understanding the perspectives of the other party.

6. Be open to compromise: In mediation, it is essential to be open-minded and flexible in finding common ground and reaching a mutually acceptable agreement. Be willing to compromise and consider alternative solutions that may differ from your initial expectations.

7. Focus on the future: Instead of dwelling on past grievances and conflicts, focus on moving forward and finding solutions that can benefit all parties involved. Keep the goal of reaching a positive resolution in mind throughout the mediation process.

8. Stay committed to the process: Successful mediation requires commitment and willingness from all parties involved to actively participate and engage in the process. Stay patient, respectful, and committed to finding a resolution, even if it takes time and effort.

9. Follow through on agreements: Once a resolution has been reached, make sure to follow through on any agreements or commitments that were made during the mediation process. This will help reinforce trust and maintain a positive outcome.

Post aided by AI

Hello, thanks for calling!

When I imagine what challenges I would have with running a small firm, it would be answering the phone. Often, potential clients want to speak with an attorney as soon as possible. Time you wait to talk to that potential client is time that they can be choosing to work with another law firm. Asking existing support staff (if any) to answer the phones takes away their time from other tasks and servicing your existing clients. Hiring a receptionist can be costly, especially when you want to compensate your staff well enough to retain them and prevent turnover. I can answer the phone myself, but what if I am meeting with a client or in a court hearing? The small firm solution is here: virtual receptionists.

The Florida Bar offers members discounts on using Smith.ai’s virtual receptionist service. With this service, your phone will always be answered, and you can decide how much information the virtual receptionists collect. The virtual receptionists can gather information about the potential client’s case, filter out cases not in your practice area, and even schedule consultations. Thinking about my potential small firm, having the virtual receptionist service gather the potential client’s contact information and basic information about their case would help prepare me to speak with that potential client and ensure that the phone is always available for new leads.

Smith.ai states on its website that it uses AI to assist its virtual receptionists and will be rolling our AI receptionists soon. The development of virtual receptionist service is a great example of how technology is making solo law practice more attainable.

A Battle for the Soul of the Universe: Life, Law, and Information

Our era as law students has an unprecedented influx of information, permeating every facet of our lives—from work and education to personal life and leisure activities. How do we continue... living? 

This deluge of data, while beneficial in many respects, also presents significant challenges, particularly in terms of our capacity to process, understand, and utilize this information effectively. 

The phenomenon, often referred to as "information overload," exacerbates the difficulty of writing, thinking, and creating with depth and reflection.


At work, the impact of information overload is nonstop. No more mingling, co-work lunch meetings. Rather, we professionals are bombarded with a constant stream of emails, reports, meetings, and notifications. 

The expectation to stay abreast of every update, combined with the pressure to respond promptly, can hinder one’s ability to focus on complex tasks or strategic thinking. The cognitive load of managing and prioritizing this onslaught of information often leaves little room for deep work, where innovative ideas and solutions are most likely to emerge.


In the realm of education, students face a similar predicament. The abundance of available resources—textbooks, academic papers, online courses, and forums—while amazing, can also overwhelm complex thinkers and learners. 

The challenge lies not only in filtering and selecting relevant information but also in synthesizing and critically analyzing these materials. This saturation can impede the development of independent thought and the ability to construct cohesive, original arguments or solutions. It can also lead to “rabbit holes” of information that may not be relevant to core learning needed in law school, for example. 


The effects of information overload extend into our personal lives as well. Social media platforms and news outlets bombard us with a ceaseless flow of content, from the mundane to the momentous. If critically minded, this can be very impactful if not burdensome on one’s day-to-day and personal relationships. 

The urge to stay constantly connected and informed can lead to cognitive fatigue, making it difficult to engage in reflective thinking or creative pursuits. Let alone personal relationships. 

The sheer volume of content vying for our attention can foster a culture of superficial engagement, where depth and nuance are often sacrificed for brevity and sensationalism.


This pervasive state of information excess necessitates the development of strategies to manage and mitigate its effects. It calls for a conscious effort to create mental space and time for processing and reflection, rather than the reverse.

Practices such as digital detoxes, setting specific times to check emails and social media, and employing techniques like the Pomodoro Technique can help individuals regain control over their attention and time. But how can we ever overcome it? 


Fostering an environment that values depth over speed, quality over quantity, is crucial. In the workplace, this might mean adopting policies that encourage focused work periods or "deep work" sessions, free from the interruption of emails or meetings. 

In educational settings, it could involve teaching and encouraging critical thinking and information literacy skills, helping students navigate and evaluate the wealth of information at their fingertips. This may be a weekly blog post, with few restrictions on content, but even that may be a challenge for some to maintain weekly.


Ultimately, the challenge of information overload is not insurmountable, but addressing it requires a deliberate and mindful approach. 

By recognizing the limitations of our cognitive capacities and adopting strategies to safeguard our mental space, we can better manage the flood of information that characterizes our modern age. Doing so not only enhances our ability to think, write, and create with depth and insight but also improves our overall well-being in a world saturated with information. Hopefully, it also helps to do better in academia, law, and work.

Despite having more access to information than ever before in human history, we face a paradoxical dilemma: what is the value of this abundance if we are unable to process, understand, and utilize it effectively? 

While the digital age has democratized access to knowledge, enabling instant communication and providing a vast reservoir of data at our fingertips, it has also brought to the forefront the challenge of discerning what is truly valuable and meaningful amidst the noise. This is the critical work of a “critical” thinker–like a lawyer, or journalist, or any profession of “human capital”.


The essence of information's value lies not in its sheer volume but in our ability to absorb, interpret, and apply it in ways that enrich our lives, foster innovation, and contribute to our communities. However, when we are overwhelmed by the constant barrage of data, our cognitive resources are stretched thin, leading to superficial understanding and diminished capacity for deep, critical thought.

This not only impacts our productivity and creativity but also our well-being and sense of connection to the world around us.

In navigating the vast sea of information, we must learn to anchor ourselves, cultivating practices and mindsets that allow us to filter, prioritize, and engage with information meaningfully. We also must learn how to discern when and where our critical thinking is most required.

It involves recognizing the importance of reflection, critical thinking, and mindfulness in our interactions with digital content. By developing these skills, we can transform the way we approach information overload, turning it from a source of stress and distraction into an opportunity for learning, growth, and innovation.


In this information-saturated age, our challenge is to redefine our relationship with digital content. It's about striking a balance between staying informed and preserving our mental space for deep thinking and creativity.

The true measure of the wealth of information available to us will not be quantified by the gigabytes of data we consume but by our ability to sift through the noise, extract meaningful insights, and apply them in ways that truly matter. 

In this context, the real currency is not information per se but our capacity to harness it thoughtfully and responsibly, ensuring that despite the deluge, we remain discerning navigators of information in the modern world. 

It's not your first, It's your last

I was recently offered a job at a law firm for when I graduate and pass the bar. The first thing that came to my mind after I was offered was, "I am not sure this is what I want to do for the next 40-50 years of my working life." But then I realized that it was okay.

In the last few weeks, it has finally come to my attention that your first job after passing the bar is not as important as it feels right now. The most important job I will have is my last job. I have realized that everything I do post-grad needs to get me to where I want to finish working in my career, whenever that is. I am unsure if everyone knows this as I watch my classmates freak out about the job search they are currently dealing with as we make our way to graduation day.

It is essential to get a good first job, but it is not life or death. We need to strive to find a job that suits us. Eventually, things will work out, and we will find that job we want to work until we retire. For now, finding a job, making some money, and getting your foot in the door is the best thing you can do for yourself.

(Forgot to publish)

Data Privacy

 Before this semester, I did not put enough thought into the importance of data privacy as I probably should have. I remember telling myself after a contracts class discussing terms and conditions that I should probably pay more mind to terms of use or terms and conditions I often silently agree to. Yet, I am still guilty of paying little attention to what I am allowing websites, applications, and companies to do with my information. 

 

A reason - besides my unwillingness to sift through terns of use - I think should get some credit is the opt-out data policies and principles, some states are starting to move away from. Opt-out allows websites to automatically start using your data when you arrive to their page. Or it will ask if you want to opt out of something before you can use their page. This method tends to lack getting explicit consent and returns a higher success rate of acceptance to the terms of use. I came across this article about Chinese hackers hacking Microsoft and accessing the email accounts of various U.S. officials (https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/02/tech/us-government-microsoft-hack/index.html ). It made me worried knowing so many peoples data could be at risk when companies and websites are susceptible to hacks like this. It got me looking into the data privacy laws states currently have and was happy to find that more and more states are improving their data privacy laws. Luckily, more states are enacting laws to give consumers more freedom of choice over how companies use there data. (https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/privacy/state-privacy-legislation-tracker/#:~:text=Currently%2C%20there%20are%2015%20states,data%20privacy%20laws%20in%20place.)

Sometimes You Don't Have to Overthink

    As Prof. Bassett pointed out in the beginning of the semester, I suspect a fair amount of us are, at heart, unwavering perfectionists who find a way to worry about minute contingencies. That's fine when you're not having to justify your time, but having had to balance the 10th of an hour billing for my work with the infinite number of rabbit holes it would lead me down, I'm comfortable saying this:

    - Sometimes good is good enough, but:
    - Sometimes good is more than enough.
    - It's better not to underestimate the other side, but:
    - You're probably overestimating them, and they're probably overestimating you, and:
    - Just because you can think it up, doesn't mean its likely to happen.

    Just food for thought.

Note: Edited because I dropped a "t" in Prof. Bassett's name (see? Perfection is an illusion)

Why Your First Job Isn't Your Last

It's essential to understand that the job you have right now is unlikely to be your last. Your first job in law, whether it's an internship, clerkship, or entry-level position, serves as a foundation for exploring the diverse areas of the legal profession. During this time, you have the chance to discover your interests, strengths, and areas of passion within the field. You might start in one practice area, only to realize that your true calling lies elsewhere. This initial phase allows you to experiment, learn, and gather valuable insights about the legal landscape and your place within it.

The early stages of your legal career are characterized by rapid skill development and growth. As you gain experience, tackle new challenges, and navigate various legal scenarios, you'll sharpen your analytical, research, and communication skills. Moreover, you'll have the opportunity to cultivate invaluable qualities such as resilience, adaptability, and professionalism – attributes that are essential for long-term success in the legal profession. Each role you undertake contributes to your professional development, equipping you with the tools and knowledge necessary to thrive in future endeavors.

The legal landscape is constantly evolving, influenced by changes in legislation, societal trends, technological advancements, and global dynamics. As a legal professional, adaptability is key to thriving in this dynamic environment. Your first job serves as a lesson in embracing change and remaining agile in the face of shifting circumstances. Whether it involves transitioning to a new practice area, joining a different firm, or exploring alternative legal careers, your ability to adapt and evolve will be instrumental in shaping your long-term success and satisfaction in the legal profession.

While your first job in law school or immediately after graduation may seem like a significant milestone, it's essential to recognize that it's just the beginning of a multifaceted and fulfilling career journey. Embrace the opportunities for exploration, growth, and specialization that lie ahead, and remember that the path to success in the legal profession is often marked by resilience, adaptability, and a continuous commitment to learning and development. Your journey in law is a dynamic and ever-evolving one, with each step paving the way for new experiences and opportunities that await on the horizon.

(this post was aided by AI)

Being OK with Being OK

 Like many others in the class, I am approaching graduation and have been thinking about my experience the last 3 years. I knew I always wanted to go to law school so I took the LSAT, got an ok score after a few times, and applied to Stetson because it was close to home. Honestly, I could have probably tried harder in the LSAT to get a better scholarship, but I didn't. Before 1L, I thought I would do amazing and easily be in the top of the class. But, as we all know, every one who is in law school are also smart, overachievers who do well in school. Otherwise, they wouldn't have gotten this far. So after my first semester I did average and was not upset about it. Law school puts so much emphasize on grades and how important they are but I was proud of myself anyway and continued on. After talking to other people about grades, it made me think about how everyone thought they would do amazing in law school. But not everyone can be in the top 10%. There needs to be someone who doing just average and ok. Is that a bad thing? NO. You are still in law school and will still graduate with the same degree as everyone else. I suppose if you are going after a certain type of job grades matter but for the most part, employers aren't going to ask you what your grade was in 1L contracts. The further away from 1L we get, the less important those grades are. Even now, I would consider myself an "average" law student. I did not go above and beyond in any way but I still am so proud of myself. I will still be successful and have a great career.

Sometimes, it is hard for people to admit that they aren't "great" at something. However, when we were reading our books for this semester, the lawyers who wrote them often said they did just okay in law school. It is nothing to be ashamed about. Just because you did ok in law school doesn't mean you won't do well in practice and vice versa. 

This same sentiment applies in so many other areas of life. Just because you aren't the best at something doesn't mean it isn't worthwhile or you shouldn't be proud. You can't be great at everything. If I picked up a guitar tomorrow, it would sound terrible. But if I tried to learn how to play and still sounded terrible, I would still be proud of myself for trying and sticking to it. I shouldn't quit and be ashamed or embarrassed. 

Overall, this was sort of a mind dump on the expectations we have for ourselves entering law school, the talk around the importance of grades, and how this relates to everything in life.

What do you guys think about this? 

Striking a Balance: My Path in Law and Giving Back

Becoming a lawyer is no small feat. It involves pouring countless hours into studying, working hard, and investing a significant amount of money. Throughout my journey to obtain a law degree, I've been confronted with a deep-seated desire to give back to my community, particularly to those who find themselves in desperate need of legal aid but lack the financial means to obtain it. This innate urge to help, however, often collides with the practical challenges of managing my time, energy, and finances, especially as a student.

As I approach the culmination of my academic journey and prepare to enter the professional realm of law, I find myself grappling with the uncertainty of how to reconcile my aspirations with the realities of practicing law. Will I have the capacity to dedicate enough time and resources to take on pro bono cases or provide legal services at reduced rates to those in need? It's a question that weighs heavily on my mind.

Despite the uncertainties, one thing remains clear: my unwavering commitment to giving back to my community. It's a core value that has shaped my journey thus far, and one that I refuse to compromise on. While the path ahead may present challenges and obstacles, I am determined to explore every avenue available to me within the legal profession to fulfill this purpose.

In contemplating my role as a future lawyer, I envision myself actively engaging with community organizations and legal aid groups, volunteering my time and expertise to assist marginalized individuals and underserved communities. Additionally, I am eager to advocate for systemic changes that promote equal access to justice for all members of society, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

As I embark on this next chapter of my life, I carry with me a profound sense of responsibility to utilize my legal knowledge and skills for the betterment of society. While the journey ahead may be fraught with challenges and uncertainties, I am steadfast in my conviction to make a positive impact and leave a lasting legacy of service and compassion.

UMINN Law no longer giving preference to minorities

 On March 30, 2024, UMINN announced that they would no longer be giving preference to minorities for fellowship. This decision came after a lawsuit was filed by Adam Kissel who cited concerns with the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights in September 2023. Kissel alleges that the fellowship discriminated applicants on the basis of sex and race, resulting in preferential treatment to woman and applicants of color. In their announcement, UMINN announced that they will be considering and choosing applicants instead "based on their commitment to enhancing diversity and inclusion." Kissel described the move to be a "win for civil rights."    

    UMINN decisions is not out of the norm, as the Supreme Court prohibited universities in June from considering race in admissions. Following the Supreme Court's decision, diversity in law students declined ~17%, with top law schools experiencing the sharpest decline of diverse students. Even so, the ban has not shown to deter people of color from applying to law schools as the current number of black and Hispanic applicants are up in comparison with last year. 

    Affirmative action and issues involving race are often considered hot-button topics with people having strong feelings on either side of the issue. Do any of you have strong opinions on whether sex and race should be taken in consideration? 

A Collapsed Bridge and Liability

 As we all know the unfortunate news of the collapsing of the Baltimore bridge last week, I can’t help but wonder who is going to be held responsible for the destruction and lost lives that came from this horrific accident. Everyone’s worst nightmare is driving off a bridge into the ocean, let alone in the middle of the night, but where does liability fall for this?

It seems clear to me that the owners of the Dali shipping container should be held liable for this. The owners of the Dali have a different idea and have already denied responsibility and are seeking to liability. The ship’s owner and manager have already filed in federal court, denying fault and neglect of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. Further, the companies are asking for exoneration from liability, but if they are found to be responsible in the inevitable lawsuits, they are asking for a cap on any pay out. 

 

The filing in Maryland District Court is seeking to cap the companies’ liability at $43.6 million. The companies used a pre-Civil War provision of an 1851 maritime law that allows them to seek to limit their liability to the value of the vessel’s remains after a casualty. Creative lawyering, but unlikely to be successful. Since the President was quick to pledge $60 million in emergency federal funding to a state bridge that was destroyed by a Singapore based ship, there is a lot of uncertainty on who should be responsible for the estimated $400 million that it will take to rebuild the bridge. 

An AI generated process on how to be successful in your first years in practice.

Starting your journey as a freshly minted attorney can be both exhilarating and daunting. As you step into the legal arena, it's essential to lay a solid foundation for your career. Here's a breakdown of steps to help you navigate and thrive in your first years as an attorney: 

1. Embrace Learning: The legal field is vast and continuously evolving. Approach your early years with an open mind and a thirst for knowledge. Take advantage of opportunities to learn from seasoned colleagues, attend legal seminars, and engage in continuing legal education (CLE) programs. Absorb as much information as you can about different areas of law and legal practice procedures. Remember, your education doesn't end with law school; it's a lifelong journey. 

2. Develop Strong Communication Skills: Effective communication is at the heart of lawyering. Whether you're drafting legal documents, negotiating with opposing counsel, or advocating in court, the ability to articulate your thoughts clearly and persuasively is crucial. Hone your writing skills by crafting concise and well-reasoned arguments. Practice active listening to understand your clients' needs fully. Cultivate professionalism in your interactions with clients, colleagues, and court personnel. 

3. Build Relationships: Networking is key to success in the legal profession. Invest time in building relationships with peers, mentors, and potential clients. Attend bar association events, join legal organizations, and participate in community activities. These connections can provide valuable support, guidance, and referral opportunities throughout your career. Remember, building a strong professional network takes time and effort but pays dividends in the long run.

 4. Seek Feedback and Mentorship: Don't hesitate to seek feedback on your work from senior attorneys or supervisors. Constructive criticism can help you identify areas for improvement and refine your legal skills. Additionally, consider finding a mentor who can offer guidance, share insights, and serve as a sounding board as you navigate your early years in practice. A mentor's wisdom and experience can be invaluable as you develop as an attorney. 

5. Prioritize Work-Life Balance: The legal profession is notorious for its demanding hours and high-stress environment. However, it's essential to prioritize your well-being to maintain long-term success and fulfillment. Establish boundaries between work and personal life, and make time for activities that rejuvenate you outside of the office. Remember that taking care of yourself allows you to perform at your best professionally.

 6. Stay Ethical and Professional: Upholding the highest standards of ethics and professionalism is non-negotiable for attorneys. Adhere to the rules of professional conduct, maintain client confidentiality, and avoid conflicts of interest. Conduct yourself with integrity, honesty, and respect in all your interactions. Your reputation as a principled and ethical attorney will precede you and contribute to your success in the legal profession. 

By following these steps and staying committed to continuous growth and improvement, you can lay a strong foundation for a successful and fulfilling career in the legal field. Remember that every challenge you encounter is an opportunity to learn and grow, and with perseverance and determination, you can achieve your professional goals as an attorney.

 

Does Chat GPT think you should be in law school?

We are often asked why we wanted to go to law school and why we want to be lawyers. Whether it is a job interview, a family dinner, or a chat with a stranger, I have gotten these questions many times. I probably decided I wanted to go to law school for sure by the time I was in high school, but I am not one of those people that say I have wanted to go my entire life (how would I have known that at 5 years old). Sometimes I don't have a precise, clear cut answer to it explaining the exact type of law I am passionate about. I am very glad I went to law school and I know it was the right choice for me, but out of curiosity, I asked Chat GPT "Should I go to law school?" I was curious to know what qualities and aspirations AI found that people should have when contemplating whether the legal field is the path for them. Here is Chat GPT's response: 

Do you think it's accurate?

Deciding whether to attend law school is a significant decision that depends on various factors such as your interests, career goals, financial situation, and personal circumstances. Here are some points to consider:

1. Interest in Law: Do you have a genuine interest in the field of law? Are you passionate about studying legal concepts, analyzing cases, and understanding how the legal system works?

2. Career Goals: What are your career aspirations? Consider whether a law degree aligns with your desired career path. While many law graduates become attorneys, others pursue careers in business, government, academia, or public service.

3. Financial Considerations: Law school can be expensive, and many students accumulate significant student loan debt. Evaluate the potential financial costs and benefits of attending law school, including tuition, living expenses, and future earning potential as a lawyer.

4. Job Market: Research the job market for lawyers in your area or in the field you're interested in. Consider factors such as job prospects, salary potential, and demand for lawyers in different practice areas.

5. Alternative Paths: Explore alternative paths to achieving your career goals. Depending on your interests and objectives, there may be other educational or career options that align better with your strengths and aspirations.

6. Skills and Qualities: Reflect on whether you possess the skills and qualities needed to succeed in law school and the legal profession, such as analytical thinking, research abilities, writing skills, and the ability to work under pressure.

7. Work-Life Balance: Consider the demands of a legal career and whether it aligns with your desired work-life balance. Lawyers often work long hours, especially in certain practice areas or during busy periods.

Ultimately, the decision to attend law school should be based on careful consideration of these factors and an understanding of your own goals and priorities. It may be helpful to speak with current law students, practicing attorneys, career counselors, and other professionals to gain insights and advice before making your decision

How to engage and benefit from media coverage of your client's case

 

While in the practice of law, the spotlight doesn't often shine on every case. But every so often, there arises a legal matter that captures the attention of the media and the public at large. For attorneys, this presents a unique challenge and opportunity. How they navigate the waters of public attention can significantly impact not only the case at hand but also their reputation and that of their client.

One day, some of us may find ourselves working on a case when suddenly, it becomes the talk of the town, making headlines on news outlets or trending on social media platforms. In such a scenario, the choices we make as a lawyer regarding engaging with the media or addressing the public can be critical.

Should the attorney choose to engage with the media coverage, there are several avenues available. An attorney might decide to craft social media posts, grant interviews to reporters, or issue statements regarding the case. However, each decision must be made with careful consideration and consultation with the client.

Engaging with the media can have its benefits. It allows an attorney to shape the narrative surrounding the case, providing clarity and context that might otherwise be missing. By speaking out, the attorney can counter misinformation and ensure that the client's perspective is heard. In some instances, it may even garner support from the public, strengthening the position in the legal battle.

Yet, this newfound visibility also comes with risks. Speaking publicly about a case can open the door to scrutiny and criticism, both for the attorney and the client. Missteps or ill-considered statements could potentially harm the case or damage your professional reputation. Moreover, the intense scrutiny of the media spotlight can add an additional layer of stress to an already complex legal matter.

Ultimately, the decision to engage with the media must be weighed carefully, taking into account the potential benefits and drawbacks. Sometimes, maintaining a low profile may be the most prudent course of action, particularly if there's little to be gained from public scrutiny. However, there are instances where silence is not an option.

In cases where the opposing party is actively engaging with the media, remaining silent can be detrimental. Failure to respond may allow the other side to control the narrative, shaping public opinion in their favor. In such situations, stepping forward to present the client's perspective becomes not just an option but a necessity.

In the end, navigating the intersection of law and media requires a delicate balance. It's about weighing the potential benefits of public engagement against the risks involved and making informed decisions that prioritize the interests of the client. While not every lawyer will find themselves in the spotlight, being prepared to handle media attention is a crucial aspect of the modern legal landscape.

Taking Classes 3L Year

With only a few weeks left of law school, I figured I would stop and give my advice for any 2Ls selecting their schedules for next year. First, choose classes that you are interested in over taking every single bar prep course. This will be the last time that most of us will ever be in school, so take subjects that you find interesting or want to know more about. In my 3L fall, I took a Sports Law class because I would like to eventually work in sports law. Plus, we got to discuss various legal topics and how they relate to sports. Second, if you can, schedule your last semester so that you have some down time. There are not going to be many opportunities left where you get a spring break, could have multiple days off in the week, and have the time to do the things you want to. Prioritize a less stressful semester so that you feel energized and ready to crush bar prep. It will also help you avoid senioritis in your 3L year. Lastly, if you have not had a clinic or an externship by this point, take one of those opportunities. These allow you to get real world experience and start to narrow the practice areas you may be interested in. Everyone’s schedule will be different as they wind down their 3L year, but try to keep some of these in mind when deciding what to take to end your law school careers. 

Will You Encourage Future Law Students?

We will all continuously encounter future law students throughout our careers. Think of all the attorneys we have annoyed over the last few years, desperately trying to network and make professional connections. I don't know about you, but I can't wait to be annoyed by future and current law students. When a non-attorney approaches you and mentions that they want to go to law school, we all have an automatic response. And I think our immediate response is fascinating because it's genuine and can tell us exactly how they feel about their career.

 

So, what’s yours? Or, rather, what do you think your go-to response will be?

 

Before I started law school, I got some interesting responses myself. I come from a family with no attorneys, never knew any attorneys, and I’d never even used an attorney’s services before. But I got a job in the mail room at the first law firm that would hire me, which gave me the opportunity to get to know several attorneys. I spoke with 4 of the firm's partners about my having already applied to law school. Two of them gave generally positive remarks. They congratulated me right away, and fondly recited their own law school journeys. It was lovely. It reassured me that I was making the right decision in my life.

 

The other two responses I received, both from very experienced corporate attorneys, were less reassuring: At the mention of law school, their response was: “Why!? Don’t do it!”

 

And they were serious! They actually urged me to reconsider going to law school and spoke with me for quite a while to try to convince me to take some other career option. Working with these men, it was painfully obvious that they hated their jobs. Eventually, both of them, after explaining all their gripes about the legal profession and trying to scare me off, admitted that being an attorney can be a rewarding career, and I ought to go to law school if I really want to and can afford it. But it was the most reluctant endorsement one could possibly give. I walked away feeling much less sure that I was making the right decision in my life.

 

I really hope I’m never those guys. I feel bad for them. Law school has been no joke, we all know that. But overall, I love learning, and I loved law school, so I will always encourage people to do this.

 

So, fellow future mentors: What is your immediate reaction when someone says they want to be a lawyer? Will you be a “congratulations” or a “don’t do it”?

The Light is at the End of the Tunnel

  Going to law school was something I had on my radar for a good portion of my life. That decision changed a few times, but I ultimately settled on that decision. I tell people outside of our bubble that law school, while trying at times, was an incredible privilege to have experienced. Other than learning the law, I think these three years expose a lot about yourself whether that be your ability to be uncomfortable, assessing where your faults and talents are, and how flexible you can be with yourself and your personal life. 

In my first year, I feel I wasted a lot of time taking advice that would not have suited my learning style or the way I structured my life. Handwriting notes? Absolutely not. Now that I have been through that trial and error (and found myself where I started), I tell 1Ls that they will hear a lot of advice and opinions, but they know themselves best so they should try not to distract themselves with all of the “best ways” to be a law student. 

It has been an interesting time, but this decision is likely the best decision I could have made for myself. These last few weeks could not be finished soon enough, but I know I’ll miss this when I am drowning in billable hour requirements. 

To those that will be graduating this May or in August – we did it. And good luck to anyone else that is about to start their final year. 

Full Time Job Requirement For Part Time Students?

As a part-time law student, I often feel like I am being pulled in a million different directions. I work remote and by appointment for my full time job and cover a very large territory so most days I am driving or traveling and then rushing to make it to class on time. My full time job is in sales so if a last minute meeting gets put on my calendar, I can't say no because it would impact my commission. My full time job is very important because without that I wouldn't be able to live comfortably or attend law school. 

I actually dropped one of my courses this semester because the professor had a strict rule that if we missed the 10 minute grace period for attendance, we would be marked absent even if we were present for the majority of class. I do not enjoy arriving late but as we all know, living in Tampa/St. Pete, the traffic can be unpredictable. For the most part, all of my professors so far have been understanding except for this one. 

Sometimes I feel frustrated that there are students in the part time program that do not have full time jobs. It's obviously not a requirement and I know we shouldn't be comparing ourselves. However, sometimes when I think about class rank or grades, I wish that I had more time to complete assignments or study for exams. I try to give myself perspective and tell myself that there are others with more demanding jobs or with full time jobs and children so in reality I have it easy. This class definitely has helped me especially when you explained how little grades/rank truly matter. I still strive to do my best, but knowing that helps take a little bit of the stress off. 

Asking AI about Lawyer's Compensation

 I asked AI if attorneys who rely heavily on AI for their research and drafting should be able to charge the same amount in fees as an attorney who does not use AI. 

At its core, the value of legal services is derived from the expertise, judgment, and guidance that lawyers provide to their clients. AI can enhance lawyers' capabilities by automating repetitive tasks, conducting legal research more efficiently, and analyzing vast amounts of data. However, the use of AI does not diminish the need for human judgment, interpretation, and advocacy, which are essential components of legal practice. Therefore, lawyers should still be compensated for the unique skills and insights they bring to the table, even if AI tools augment their work.

On the other hand, the integration of AI into legal practice may increase lawyers' productivity and enable them to serve clients more effectively and affordably. In such cases, clients may expect to see cost savings reflected in legal fees, as AI-driven efficiencies reduce the time and resources required to handle certain tasks. However, it is essential to recognize that the development and implementation of AI systems entail costs, including initial investment, training, and maintenance. Therefore, while the use of AI may lead to more streamlined and cost-effective legal services, lawyers should still receive fair compensation for their expertise, time, and efforts, whether they utilize AI tools or not. Ultimately, the key is to strike a balance that acknowledges the value of both human legal professionals and AI technologies in delivering high-quality legal services to clients.

Social Media’s Power in Modern Day Law Firms

 In the fast-paced digital age we live in, social media has become an essential tool for businesses to connect with their audience and attract clients.One of the key ways social media influences client intake in law firms is through increased visibility and brand awareness. Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram allow law firms to showcase their expertise, share valuable insights on legal matters, and engage with potential clients in a more personal and accessible way. By creating compelling content and establishing a strong online presence, law firms can attract a larger audience and stand out in a competitive market.

Moreover, social media provides a powerful platform for client testimonials and reviews. Positive feedback from satisfied clients can help build credibility and trust in the firm's services, influencing potential clients' decision-making process. By encouraging clients to share their experiences on social media, law firms can leverage word-of-mouth marketing to attract new clients and enhance their reputation in the legal industry.

Additionally, social media enables law firms to target specific demographics and reach a more tailored audience. Through targeted advertising and sponsored content, firms can connect with individuals who are more likely to require legal services, leading to higher quality leads and increased client intake. By analyzing data and engagement metrics, law firms can refine their social media strategies to ensure maximum impact and return on investment.

In conclusion, the role of social media in influencing client intake for law firms cannot be underestimated. By embracing digital marketing strategies, engaging with their audience, and leveraging the power of social proof, law firms can attract new clients, build strong relationships, and ultimately drive growth in their practice. In today's competitive landscape, staying relevant and visible on social media is not just an option but a necessity for law firms looking to thrive in the modern market.

ChatGPT was used to aid creation of this post

Is AI the End of Lawyers? Exploring the Possibility of Legal Automation

 In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in various industries, revolutionizing processes and streamlining operations. One profession that's frequently speculated about in terms of AI disruption is law. With the ability to analyze vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and even generate legal documents, some argue that AI could potentially make lawyers obsolete in the future.

The idea of AI replacing lawyers raises numerous questions and considerations. While it's true that AI can automate certain tasks traditionally performed by lawyers, such as legal research, document review, and contract drafting, it's essential to recognize the limitations of current AI technology.

Legal practice involves more than just analyzing data and drafting documents; it requires nuanced understanding, interpretation, and application of the law to complex real-world scenarios. Lawyers bring empathy, critical thinking, and strategic reasoning to their work—qualities that are not easily replicated by AI.

Moreover, the legal profession encompasses various practice areas, each with its unique challenges and intricacies. While AI may excel in specific tasks within these areas, such as due diligence in corporate law or document review in litigation, it's unlikely to replace the diverse skill set of a competent lawyer.

Instead of viewing AI as a threat to the legal profession, many experts see it as a tool that can enhance lawyers' capabilities and efficiency. By automating repetitive tasks, AI can free up lawyers' time to focus on higher-value work, such as counseling clients, developing legal strategies, and advocating in court.

Furthermore, the human element of lawyering—building relationships, understanding clients' needs, and providing personalized advice—remains indispensable. While AI can provide valuable insights and assistance, it cannot replace the trust and rapport that clients develop with their legal representatives.

In conclusion, while AI has the potential to transform certain aspects of the legal profession, the idea of it making lawyers obsolete is far-fetched. Instead, the future of law is likely to be shaped by the collaboration between human lawyers and AI technologies, leading to more efficient, informed, and accessible legal services for clients.

As AI continues to evolve, it's essential for legal professionals to adapt and embrace these technological advancements while staying true to the core values of their profession. Ultimately, the integration of AI into the legal ecosystem has the potential to drive innovation and improve the delivery of justice, rather than replace the vital role that lawyers play in society.

Law School Finals

     In undergrad and high school there were typically weekly assignments or quizzes and then every few weeks we would have a test to measure our understanding of topics while we were learning. When someone would ask how school was going or how you were doing in a certain subject you would have somewhat of an idea based on these scores. Now, when someone asks me how the semester is going or how I am doing in a certain class I tell them I really do not know until finals. Yes, I know if I am understanding a topic or not based on that weeks readings and the questions and discussions we have in class. However, with many of our grades dependent on one final exam it can sometimes lead to some uncertainty of whether or not you are understanding a topic as thoroughly as required for the final exam.

    I remember my first finals period in my 1L year and the pressure of knowing that my entire grade relied on just one exam. While I do not necessarily see this as something negative I do think that this is something that does lead to some added pressure when it comes to final exams. I have learned over my semesters in law school that it is crucial to ask questions, take detailed notes and write down your questions no matter how big or small so when you are preparing for the final exam you have even more of a roadmap of your personal thought process during the semester. Many professors will also offer practice questions that they will give you feedback on that somewhat compare to those you will see on their exam which is also extremely beneficial. While it can be scary to have some classes rely on one grade to determine your performance in the class, this is ultimately what the bar exam will do as well. Therefore, I do not mind the idea of taking one big exam in many of my classes but it was defiantly something that took some getting used to when I first entered law school.