The Crucial Importance of Self-Care: Why It's More Than Just a Trend

In our fast-paced world, where hustle culture often glorifies working non-stop and prioritizing productivity over well-being, the concept of self-care has emerged as a beacon of sanity. But self-care is much more than just indulging in occasional pampering or relaxation; it's a fundamental necessity for our mental, emotional, and physical health.

At its core, self-care is about recognizing and honoring our own needs. It involves intentionally taking steps to nurture ourselves on all levels - mind, body, and soul. While the term might conjure images of bubble baths and spa days, true self-care goes beyond surface-level activities. It encompasses practices like setting boundaries, practicing mindfulness, nurturing relationships, maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and seeking professional help when needed.
One of the most significant benefits of self-care is its ability to combat stress. Chronic stress can wreak havoc on our bodies and minds, leading to a myriad of health issues such as anxiety, depression, and even physical ailments. By engaging in regular self-care practices, we equip ourselves with the tools to manage stress more effectively, promoting resilience and overall well-being.

Furthermore, self-care plays a vital role in fostering self-love and acceptance. In a world that often bombards us with unrealistic standards and expectations, practicing self-compassion becomes revolutionary. By prioritizing our own needs and treating ourselves with kindness and understanding, we cultivate a positive relationship with ourselves, enhancing our self-esteem and confidence in the process.

Moreover, self-care isn't just beneficial for individuals; it also has ripple effects on our relationships and communities. When we take care of ourselves, we're better equipped to show up fully for others. By modeling healthy boundaries and self-respect, we inspire those around us to prioritize their well-being as well, creating a culture of care and support.

In essence, self-care isn't a luxury reserved for the privileged few; it's a fundamental aspect of leading a fulfilling and balanced life. By carving out time to nurture ourselves and prioritize our well-being, we invest in our long-term health and happiness. So let's make self-care a non-negotiable part of our routines, recognizing its profound importance in cultivating a life of vitality and purpose.

Blog post generated using AI

Tips for Law School

As I approach the final weeks of my law school career, I would like to share some helpful tips I wish I knew before starting law school. 

Ask for Help Early

A lot of the topics you learn in law school build off each other, so if you do not understand one thing, you might not understand the next thing. I remember being very confused in my Contracts class because I did not understand the foundational lessons, and it hurt me. I had to cram right before the midterm and final and teach myself much of what I could have asked for clarification on earlier in the semester. If you are confused about something in class, do not be afraid to raise your hand and ask questions. Do not be afraid to speak to your professor during office hours. I worked in education before attending law school and trust me when I say that professors would rather help you before an exam than give you a bad grade. 

Similarly, reach out to your TA. They were in your shoes once, so they understand the struggle. They also might be able to explain a concept differently than your professor, thus allowing you to understand the material better. My TAs also gave me advice about other professors and classes, helping me better choose which classes to take.

Try to Find the Cheapest Textbooks

Law school is very expensive. It’s not just tuition you have to pay, it’s also housing, food, study materials, school supplies, bar preparation programs, and textbooks. Some classes I have considered taking require textbooks that cost over $300. That is so much money for a book that might become outdated in a year. Look for used textbooks on online selling platforms such as Amazon, eBay, and Mercari. Some of your required reading materials may even be available for free at the school library. I saved a few hundred dollars by borrowing my books from the library when I needed them. 

Utilize the Resources Provided by the School

Stetson provides free online access to many study materials, such as digital books and lectures. Additionally, Stetson students can access Barbri lecture videos and practice questions for free. But it’s not just study materials Stetson offers. I have saved a lot of money on gym memberships by exercising at the school’s gym. I have also learned invaluable information from the school’s career office and from speakers brought in by student organizations. Schools exist to provide for students, so take advantage of what is offered. 

Prioritize Your Mental Health

Law school is stressful, and it is easy to beat yourself up when you do not understand something or do poorly when called on in class. Your mental health is more important than your grades, so make sure you nurture it. Take study breaks when you need to. Sleep an extra hour or two if you need it. Engage in your favorite hobbies or watch your favorite movies. There are student organizations on campus that focus on nurturing mental health, and they do a lot of great events. 

Find a Group of People You Trust and Like

Law school is tough, so you need a support system within the school to help you study and cheer you up when you are feeling down. I found a group my first semester, and we helped each other a lot. I am still friends with the same group I studied with and socialized with in my first year, and I know I will remain friends with them for life. 

Make Sure You Really Want to be in Law School

As discussed above, law school is expensive and stressful. If you aren’t sure law school is right for you, don’t be afraid to speak to someone about it, and don’t be afraid to decide that you no longer want to be in law school. 

My First Time Interacting With AI: I’m Scared

So, this is officially my first time interacting with AI. I decided I would try chat GPT as I had never used it before. I decided to start with a question based on what our class is based on - starting your own law practice. This is what I got. 

AI responds to “How to start your own law practice”

Starting your own law practice can be a challenging but rewarding endeavor. Here are some steps to help you get started:

1. Establish your practice area: Determine what area of law you want to specialize in, whether it's criminal defense, family law, real estate, or another field. It's important to choose a practice area that interests you and where you have expertise.

2. Create a business plan: Develop a business plan that outlines your goals, target market, marketing strategy, and financial projections. This will help you stay focused and organized as you launch your practice.

3. Obtain necessary licenses and permits: In order to practice law, you'll need to be licensed in your state. Make sure to obtain all necessary licenses and permits before opening your practice.

4. Set up your office: Find a suitable location for your office, whether it's a traditional brick-and-mortar space or a virtual office. Make sure your office is equipped with the necessary technology and amenities to support your practice.

5. Build a network: Networking is essential for building a successful law practice. Attend industry events, join professional organizations, and connect with other attorneys in your area to build a strong network of contacts.

6. Develop a marketing strategy: Create a marketing plan to promote your practice and attract clients. This could include creating a website, using social media, attending networking events, and advertising in local publications.

7. Manage your finances: Keep track of your expenses, set a budget, and establish billing practices for your clients. Consider hiring a bookkeeper or accountant to help you manage your finances.

8. Stay organized: As a solo practitioner, you'll need to wear many hats. Stay organized by using practice management software, creating workflows, and setting up systems to manage your caseload effectively.

Starting your own law practice takes hard work, dedication, and perseverance. By following these steps and staying focused on your goals, you can build a successful practice that serves your clients and supports your professional growth.

Honestly, not what I was expecting. It sounds so human, like I could have wrote it (although the AI probably did it better). I guess it was a bit shocking. I was curious to how it would respond to a question surrounding wellbeing and law practice. This is what it gave me!

AI responds to “How to stay happy in law practice”

1. Find fulfillment in helping others: Remember the impact you have on your clients' lives and the difference you are making in the justice system. Find joy in the service you provide and the positive impact you can have on others.

2. Practice self-care: Take care of your physical and mental health by making time for exercise, relaxation, and hobbies outside of work. Set boundaries to prevent burnout and prioritize self-care practices that rejuvenate you.

3. Focus on the positive: Stay positive and focus on the aspects of your work that bring you joy and fulfillment. Celebrate your successes and accomplishments, no matter how small, and maintain a gratitude practice to remind yourself of the good in your life and work.

4. Surround yourself with supportive colleagues and mentors: Cultivate a strong support system of colleagues, mentors, and friends who understand the challenges of the legal profession and can provide guidance, advice, and encouragement when you need it.

5. Set realistic goals and priorities: Manage your workload, set realistic goals, and prioritize tasks to prevent feeling overwhelmed and stressed. Break down large tasks into smaller, manageable steps and celebrate your progress along the way.

6. Seek work-life balance: Strive to find a balance between your work and personal life by setting boundaries, prioritizing self-care, and making time for the things that bring you joy outside of work. Remember that your well-being is essential to your success in your legal career.

7. Stay connected to your passion for the law: Remember why you chose to pursue a career in law and reconnect with your passion for the legal profession. Stay informed on legal developments, engage in continuing education opportunities, and seek out challenging and stimulating cases that keep you engaged and motivated.

8. Practice mindfulness and stress management techniques: Incorporate mindfulness and stress management techniques into your daily routine to stay grounded, present, and resilient in the face of challenges. Consider meditation, deep breathing exercises, and mindfulness practices to help you stay calm and focused in the practice of law.

So now, even more thoroughly creeped out. I guess I should be amazed and astounded, but I have to say I’m more skeptical of AI than I am excited about it. Maybe its the amount of original star trek episodes I watched as a kid (and lets face it I still watch them), but I am a bit concerned about AI evolving to replace humans or human work product. I also feel a bit old school, just in my general personality, so this probably contributes to this mind set as well. 

Lastly, I tried the prompt that I wrote about last week. I will say this time around, I beat the AI in both quality writing and quantity!

AI responds to “Does size matter in law practice?”

“Size can impact a law practice in several ways. A larger law firm may have more resources, expertise, and experience to handle complex cases or a wider range of legal matters. They may also have a larger network of attorneys and staff to support their clients.

On the other hand, a smaller law practice may offer more personalized attention and tailored legal solutions to clients. Smaller firms may also be more flexible and able to provide creative and cost-effective legal strategies. Additionally, clients may feel more valued and have direct access to the attorneys working on their case in a smaller firm.

Ultimately, the importance of size in a law practice depends on the specific needs and preferences of the client. Some clients may prefer the resources and reputation of a larger firm, while others may prioritize the personalized attention and relationship with their attorney in a smaller practice.”

Post assisted by AI

Should Employers Check Employee's Social Media

Since college I have always been told to be careful what I post on social media because employers will look at it. I was a D1 athlete on scholarship so I had to be extremely diligent to ensure that I didn't post anything inappropriate or my scholarship would've been taken away. However, since then social media has become even more popular with more added platforms. I even see a lot of people posting about their jobs and their employers on social media. I wonder if employers actually check social media when hiring a candidate. 

Carrying yourself professionally is still important because it's a representation of your business and how you do business. I was surprised when I found out one of my professors at Stetson posted very controversial things on social media. It had a very negative impact on our class and caused a lot of dissension. While free speech is important I think you can still have your freedom of speech while acting professionally. I feel that Stetson should've done its due diligence to make sure her social media was professional just like any other corporation would do when hiring an employee. There is so much controversy in our world today, it's better to keep things civil when it comes to work and education. 

2L vs 3L in job searches

 I found that there are a lot of law firms that only search for 2L's rather than 3L's soon to graduate and take the bar. While I am sure there are a multitude of factors, I think the prime reasons boil down to just two or three.

One reason, giving the benefit of the doubt, is that the firm cannot afford to expand and take on another licensed attorney right now. However, I have seen this practice more prominent on the bigger firms that can definitely afford taking on a couple more attorneys and not have it financially harm the firm. 

However, the bigger reason I have seen and came to the conclusion is that the firms, even ones with 20+ attorney's, don't need to bring another licensed attorney for more money on, when if they get enough 2L labor, they can pay at a much cheaper cost the work needed to be done and then only review it and make simple adjustments. So they can take on much more work at a lower cost. 

I personally saw this as a firm of 17, was looking for a niche experience/background of their applicants but said the prospects of finding those that had it were extremely low. So when I had the exact experience and background into the field that they were hoping for, they kept repeating the 2L search parameters. They said they were looking for people with this background/experience so that they did not have to spend a lot of time training in the niche terms and character of the businesses they would be representing and understanding the facts of the cases that they encounter. But they only wanted to bring on 2L's. So my summation was that they just wanted the cheaper labor to bring on temporarily and the background/experience was to lessen how much time they have to train the 2L temps. 

Has anyone else witnessed?

A brief post about Stetson's career fair.

     Yesterday was the first time I'd been to one of the on-campus career events. I arrived at 1 PM, so later in the event, but definitely still within the 11 - 2 window, and was unpleasantly surprised at how folks were starting to pack up. The College might want to do a better job of persuading attendees to stay until the end for those of us having to run PTO and commute onto campus...

    But, on the flip side, it was also reassuring to speak with practicing attorneys who showed a genuine interest in me and my resume - it helped to shake the creeping anxiety of graduation and the job search. It's easy to get locked into that doom spiral if you don't have the occasional dose of reality (that we're entering a fairly tight knit and cordial profession) to yank you out of it.

Another Stetson Tuition Increase

 Stetson has once again raised its tuition prices to the surprise to no one but to the dismay of all. But this price hike is different than the last couple. In previous years, the dreaded tuition increase announcement included details as to why the increase. Two years ago the increase was due to COVID and rising costs for the school, the email told us. Last year, Stetson told us that the tuition increase was due to rising costs and inflation and they were just trying to keep up with it. Both of these I could argue are completely unnecessary for a school that already charges as much as it does but I digress.

This year, Stetson has no reason for a price increase. The only thing mentioned is that the board of trustees voted for the increase. No reason just that they voted for it. I think that the board of trustees will vote for an increase every year as it means more money in their pockets and less in ours. 

Luckily, I am a 3L and this won’t be my problem. Stetson’s continued tuition increase over the toughest mental and financial years for their students shows that they are only worried about one thing, and it’s not their students. 

There must be something better than doom scrolling

I just can't stand the news, and I know I'm not alone. For a long time, I avoided the news, and I still do, to be honest. It's exhausting, depressing, time consuming, and the very last thing I want to do when I am home trying to relax and enjoy my life. Watching or reading the news is simply not a relaxing or enjoyable activity to me. I understand that some people feel very differently, and that is just my point– we all consume media a little differently, and I know that I am not alone in being quite repulsed by basically any news outlet. I will never, and I mean never, browse news articles myself. I am the kind of person who only reluctantly clicks on links sent to me by others. These others know that I am living in the dark ages and desperately want to help me, bless their hearts.

But avoiding the news all together is not the thing to do. I just want to be informed, and I think that's a minimum standard we can all strive for. Feeling out of the loop is also anxiety and stress-inducing. I used to live in fear that someone will bring up something in conversation– a foreign government that recently collapsed, or a far-away natural disaster, or an on-going civil war that I somehow would be completely oblivious to.

I've come up with two solutions that actually work pretty well by keeping me informed and my blood pressure at a normal level. First, good old Wikipedia. A lot of people don't realize that Wikipedia has a homepage and a lot of neat features besides being the world's largest free online encyclopedia. The homepage has a convenient "in the news" box that gives you the major highlights, and, of course, links to the Wikipedia page on the event, which is always incredibly up to date and well-sourced. It's really remarkable. If you want to keep up with a major developing news story, you can't do much better than refreshing Wikipedia every few minutes.

The second is this service called "The New Paper" that sends me a simple text message every morning with 8-10 of the top global headlines for that day, and links to impartial, generally reliable (that I've found) sources for each story. I discovered this about two years ago. I saw an ad on Reddit and the concept immediately appealed to me. I singed up right away, and I'm still subscribed! The texts give me a simplified, facts-first approach to the news that keeps me appraised of major events and doesn't try to suck me in. It could not be more straight-forward and practical. The other reason I like it so much is because of the format- texts. It's impossible for me not to notice that I got the news that day. If it were an email newsletter, they would quickly pile up in the inbox, unread. But texts are more personal and direct. I can read my daily news brief basically anywhere because it's so quick and easily accessible. I don't have to wait for anything to load, or even click on anything. It's only $5 a month, and since it's impossible for me to leave a text message unread, I read it every single day. Check out my screen shots below of my text message from this morning, as an example.

So those are the two solutions that work for me. I'm curious if anyone else uses some alternative way to stay informed on world events that doesn't involve traditional media. Let me know!

Law Schools Should Implement Mid-Semester Evaluations

The past two semesters I have had a professor that does mid-semester evaluations. This is not something I had seen before, but I think it is an important tool that more teachers should seek to add. The intent is to allow the professor to identify where their methods are and are not connecting well with students. This may be more or less effective depending on how experienced a professor is. Someone who has been teaching for twenty years is probably less likely to alter their style. 

That being said, I think it can at least create more awareness with professors because not all classes will respond to the same methods of teaching. Waiting until the end of semester evaluations before a professor can understand where they fell short does little to help the current group of students because they will move on – and will likely avoid bidding on that professor’s classes in the future. 

It can be hard to accommodate for all types of learners, but if one group is being left behind because a professor does not provide PowerPoints or some other tool that could benefit student, they should be aware they are indeed falling short. Law can be hard sometimes and not all students are comfortable addressing their concerns face-to-face so providing an anonymous assessment mid-semester could really improve their learning abilities. 

Pros and Cons of Zoom Court of Law

In an age where digital transformation is sweeping across various sectors, even the hallowed halls of justice have not been immune to the shift. The emergence of virtual courtrooms, facilitated by platforms like Zoom, has sparked both praise and criticism within the legal community and beyond. Let's delve into the benefits and disadvantages of conducting court proceedings through Zoom.

Virtual courtrooms break down geographical barriers, allowing individuals from remote locations or with mobility issues to participate in legal proceedings without the need for physical presence. This accessibility fosters a more inclusive justice system. Conducting court sessions via Zoom can significantly reduce costs associated with travel, accommodation, and courtroom maintenance. This not only benefits litigants but also alleviates the burden on the justice system's budget. With Zoom, court hearings can be scheduled more flexibly, potentially reducing scheduling conflicts and delays. Additionally, virtual platforms often streamline administrative tasks such as document sharing and electronic filing, saving time for all involved parties. Amidst public health concerns, virtual courtrooms offer a safer alternative by minimizing the need for in-person interactions. This is especially pertinent during times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, where maintaining social distancing measures is paramount. By reducing the need for physical travel, virtual court proceedings contribute to a lower carbon footprint, aligning with sustainability goals and environmental conservation efforts.

On the flip side of the argument, poor internet connection, audio/video disruptions, and unfamiliarity with technology can hinder the smooth conduct of virtual court sessions. Such technical difficulties may impede effective communication and compromise the integrity of legal proceedings. Zoom, like any online platform, is susceptible to cybersecurity threats such as hacking and unauthorized access. Ensuring the confidentiality and security of sensitive legal information poses a significant challenge in the virtual realm. Virtual courtrooms may also lack the nuanced interpersonal dynamics present in traditional court settings. Non-verbal cues, which often play a crucial role in assessing witness credibility and gauging courtroom atmosphere, may be more challenging to discern over video conferencing.

The transition to virtual courtrooms via platforms like Zoom presents both opportunities and challenges for the legal system. While enhancing accessibility, efficiency, and safety, virtual proceedings must navigate technical hurdles, security risks, and concerns about the erosion of traditional courtroom norms. Striking a balance between leveraging technological advancements and preserving the integrity of legal proceedings remains paramount as the legal landscape continues to evolve in the digital age.

(This post was aided by AI)

When's the Last Time You Took a Little Time for Yourself?

Us law students are no strangers to stress. Between endless reading assignments and the pressure of final exams, it's part of the gig. When that stress piles up and reaches insurmountable levels, it's easy to get burnt out. Burnout is a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion that can make accomplishing even the easiest of tasks seem unnecessarily daunting and difficult. I'm sure a lot of us have experienced burnout, but how do we avoid reaching that point in the future, and especially once we enter the practice of law?

One tip I've seen is to be diligent about setting boundaries. Attorneys often feel pressure to be constantly available for their clients, but that is an unsustainable way to live. My personal plan is to have a set time in the evenings where I will no longer be checking work emails or texts. While this may not be doable all of the time (and depending on your job, maybe none of the time), putting this boundary in place whenever possible will hopefully allow me to maintain a healthy work-life balance.

In avoiding burnout, self-care is non-negotiable. You absolutely must carve out time for hobbies, exercise, or whatever it is you personally enjoy doing, or you will inevitably become sick of your work. For me, this means attempting to maximize my weekends with a mix of fun and relaxation, and maintaining my exercise routine. I have personally found that exercise is one of the most important aspects for my personal burnout prevention.

Don't get me wrong; there's nothing wrong with having a strong work ethic or being a "workaholic." Just make some time for yourself too.

Choosing your legal field post law school

 Embarking on the journey through law school is an exhilarating experience, but as the end draws near, a critical decision looms large: which legal field to pursue? The pressure to select a specialization can be daunting, and for many, the uncertainty persists even as graduation approaches.

One of the primary challenges faced by aspiring lawyers is the expectation to determine their career path independently. Unlike other professions where specialization may come later through on-the-job exposure, law demands a more immediate commitment. This pressure can lead to anxiety and indecision, especially considering the myriad of legal avenues available.

Moreover, the consequences of choosing the wrong path can be significant. Transitioning between legal fields can be complex and time-consuming, requiring additional education or experience. This potential for misalignment between personal interest and chosen specialization underscores the importance of informed decision-making.

While some students enter law school with a clear vision of their future practice area, many others struggle to identify their passions amidst the academic rigor. Limited exposure to different legal fields within the curriculum can exacerbate this challenge, leaving students to rely on external resources for exploration.

However, amidst these challenges lies opportunity. Law school presents a unique environment for self-discovery and exploration. Engaging with professors, alumni, and practicing attorneys, as well as participating in internships and externships, can provide invaluable insights into various legal specialties.

Ultimately, while the decision may feel overwhelming, it is essential to approach it with patience, introspection, and a willingness to explore. By embracing the journey of self-discovery, aspiring lawyers can navigate the path towards their chosen legal field with confidence and purpose.

Should I pursue public interest or private after graduation?

 

    It should be no surprise that a significant number of law school graduates may not pursue public interest jobs after graduation. Many students are saddled with an exorbitant amount of student loan debt, so working in public interest may not be an option. Since public interest jobs pay less than positions in private firms or corporate law it is obvious that the higher-paying opportunities more attractive from a financial perspective. Another consideration is that public interest jobs, particularly those in government agencies or nonprofit organizations, may not offer the same level of job stability or long-term career advancement opportunities as positions in private practice. As a result, this lack of stability can deter some graduates from pursuing public interest careers.

    There is also a common perception in the legal profession that working at prominent law firms or in corporate settings is more prestigious than pursuing public interest work. This view can influence graduates' career decisions and lead them to prioritize opportunities in higher-profile sectors. Public interest jobs also involve heavy workloads, limited resources, and challenging cases that require dedicated effort and commitment. Some graduates may prefer a more predictable and less demanding work environment, which can lead them to opt for private sector positions.

    Even though graduates participated in pro-bono opportunities while in law school, many may have limited exposure to public interest opportunities and may be more familiar with the traditional career paths offered by private firms. The lack of information and guidance on public interest careers can deter graduates from exploring these options.

    Overall, a combination of financial concerns, career aspirations, availability of opportunities, and societal perceptions about legal practice may contribute to the lower number of law school graduates pursuing public interest jobs. Addressing these barriers and increasing awareness about the value and impact of public interest work can help encourage more graduates to consider and pursue careers in this important sector of the legal profession.

    Until recently, I had not considered pursuing a public interest career, but as I inch closer to graduation the thought has crossed my mind.

Contemporary Unacceptable Firing Etiquette

In the modern workplace, few experiences are as stressful as being fired. It's a moment that can shatter your sense of security. While terminations are sometimes unavoidable due to business realities, the process through which they are conducted speaks volumes about an organization's values and integrity.

One of the most egregious offenses in firing etiquette is the use of fake meetings or deceptive tactics to terminate employees, like in the article. This practice is not only disrespectful but also unprofessional and ultimately detrimental to both the individual being let go and the company's reputation. Not only does this approach lack transparency and honesty, but it also demonstrates a blatant disregard for the individual's time and dignity. These actions can decrease trust and create uncertainty among remaining employees.

The prevalence of this problem speaks to larger issues within corporate culture. In many cases, the motivation behind these tactics is rooted in profit-driven decisions rather than genuine concern for employees' well-being. Executives may opt for outsourcing in cheaper countries to cut costs and boost profits. There are alternatives like reallocating resources rather than prioritizing executives’ financial gain. It highlights a lack of ethical leadership and I'm sure part of it is that it's easier to fire someone remotely rather than face-to-face where you have to see the aftermath.

Executives should be willing to lead by example, even if it means making personal sacrifices. Taking a pay cut or forgoing bonuses during challenging times could send a powerful message of solidarity to employees. Firing them remotely or during a "meeting" sends a powerful message too and it's not a good one. 

Public Perceptions on Solo Firms

 Last class, we talked about when choosing a law firm to represent you against an insurance company, some people felt more comfortable choosing a larger law firm. With a larger law firm comes more resources and manpower behind it. If you were trying to fight an insurance company for a major claim, you might choose these larger firms over a smaller firm. Although smaller firms may have just as much experience and be fully capable of representing you in a lawsuit, some people are apprehensive of choosing them. 

This idea made me think about the public perception of smaller firms and, specifically, solo firms. When I was telling my mom about how lawyers now can run an entire firm off of their iPhone or tablet, she seemed to think that firms that run this way were not as professional as other firms. She said she would more likely pick a law firm that has a physical office than someone who operates over Zoom. This may be a generational thing or just a personal preference. 

And this is not the only disadvantage that solo firms have when dealing with public perception. An article in Above the Law talks about how the public may think that lawyers who open their own firm did so because they couldn't find a firm to work for. Of course, there is the other side of this that you get to be your own boss when you work for yourself and you can create your own rules and schedule. This is most likely the reason lawyers actually decide to go solo. Another public perception is it isn't as prestigious to be a solo lawyer as it is to work at a firm with a reputation attached to it. I think this one depends on the client and whether they are in a field where whether you have a prestigious law firm really matters to them. Plus, people who went to prestigious law schools and had prestigious careers became solo lawyers, as the article points out. 

Overall, depending on the person, they may not feel confident or comfortable hiring a solo lawyer, especially one that is fully digital. It may also depend on the area of law and the type of case they have. Is it a catastrophic personal injury with a million dollars on the line, or are you trying to get out of a traffic ticket? Just like any profession, there are misconceptions about areas of it, and this is one area of them. What are your thoughts on these perceptions? 

Source: https://abovethelaw.com/2019/04/many-people-have-flawed-perceptions-about-solo-practitioners/

Dell's Deskless Dillema

Dell's recent policy shift toward returning to the office and restricting promotions for remote workers has ignited significant debate and criticism. While Dell underscores the importance of in-person collaboration, this approach presents notable challenges for employees who have thrived in remote work environments. Many individuals have attested to improved work-life balance and heightened productivity while working remotely, making the mandate to return to the office a potential disruption to established routines and preferences. Moreover, penalizing remote workers by limiting their opportunities for career advancement undermines their contributions and perpetuates disparities in professional growth. 

Additionally, Dell's policy may have far-reaching implications for talent retention and recruitment efforts. In an era where remote work options are increasingly valued, particularly amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, companies rigidly enforcing in-office requirements risk alienating top talent and eroding their competitive edge in the labor market. Furthermore, such policies may disproportionately impact certain demographic groups, including caregivers and individuals with disabilities, who greatly benefit from the flexibility offered by remote work arrangements. By disregarding the significance of remote work in fostering employee well-being and productivity, Dell risks appearing out of touch with contemporary work trends and employee expectations. 

Ultimately, Dell's restrictive approach fails to acknowledge the evolving nature of work and the shifting preferences of employees regarding remote work options. In today's interconnected world, technological advancements have facilitated seamless remote collaboration, challenging traditional notions of where work must occur. By discounting the potential benefits of remote work arrangements, Dell risks alienating its workforce and hindering its ability to adapt to the changing landscape of the modern workplace. As companies navigate the complexities of post-pandemic work environments, prioritizing flexibility and responsiveness to diverse employee needs and preferences becomes increasingly crucial for cultivating a supportive and thriving organizational culture.

As a former Dell employee, I am ecstatic that I am no longer with the company. 

Bar Prep Classes... To Take or Not to Take

 As a 3L, I am currently in 2 bar prep focused classes (survey and multistate). I find it interesting that we do not actually know how helpful these classes will be for us until we ultimately take the bar. In past years, these classes were pass/fail. This changed very recently. I am curious to know if changing them to actual graded courses has been beneficial to bar passage rates, or if other factors contributed more. 

My dad went to law school years ago and found it surprising that bar prep classes are so common now. They were not offered when he went to law school, and bar prep was more of a self learning type of task. I feel like no one has really talked about this shift in focus onto bar prep. 

In some ways, it must be beneficial because it helps us acclimate to the type of questions asked on the bar. However, when we are in practice we are not going to be asked a multiple choice question with a bizarre scenario. The bar exam is strategic, so learning these strategies is definitely helpful, but sometimes when I am sitting in class I wish I was learning about a legal topic that really interests me. On the other hand though, it is nice to have a head start into reintroducing topics that I haven't looked at since 1L. 

I guess I am just hoping that these courses will be helpful when I start my bar prep and then take the bar in July. The best we can do is put effort into this courses and hope that they are worthwhile. 

Remote Working and Colleague Relations

    Aspects of the legal profession such as meeting with clients, virtual court proceedings and other areas have all been impacted by the increase in popularity of working from home. When thinking about these areas the first thing that comes to my mind is the attorney client relationship and how remote working can impact meetings with clients. However, one thing I think should also adressed is the impact that remote work can have on colleagues in certain firms. 

Some firms allow lawyers to choose which days they wish to work remote. By allowing this, you and the person in the office next to you may never be in the office on the same day. While this may not be a huge issue because you are both doing separate work, in certain situations it can surely influence the relationship you have with colleagues. 

Working in an office next to someone allows for in person conversation, quick questions while passing their office doorway and other general daily conversations. These are conversations one may not have if they only speak to their colleague via phone or email because you strictly contact each other for work related questions which can be much different than in person conversation.

I think that this is something that can greatly affect certain firms where lawyers are not given the opportunity to strengthen their professional relationships with colleagues by working in a professional atmosphere together. With that being said I do not necessarily think that firms should require attorneys to all be in the office every day, or for a certain number of days. However, I do think that at least once every week or every other week all attorneys in a firm should try to be in the office on the same day.

Have you heard about ex-celebrirty Lawyer Tom Girardi?

    Tom Girardi was a high-powered attorney and co-founder of Girardi & Keese, a law firm in downtown LA. He was known for being the first attorney ever in the state of California to win $1 million dollars for a medical malpractice case. Other notable cases Girardi handled include against Lockheed Martin Corp., Pacific Gas & Electric Co, Boeing 747, and several major Hollywood movie studios. 

    In the suit against Pacific Gas & Electric, he was able to garner a $460 million dollar payday to the 650 residents of Hinkley, California that got diagnosed with cancer (among other diseases) from drinking contaminated water that was leaking from their gas station. The general sentiment of Girardi's practice was that he was for the everyday people and was there to help them when tragic situations like this arose. 

    In 2003, Girardi was inducted in the Trial lawyer hall of fame by the California State Bar and later became the President of the International Academy of Trial lawyers. 

    After decades of being hailed as a top attorney, an admiral member of the community,  a federal judge froze Girardi's assets in 2020, alleging that he had "misappropriated at least $2 million in client funds that were due to the families of those killed" by the Boeing 737 plane crash in Indonesia. This was just the start of a slew of lawsuits and controversies regarding his shady practices and embezzlement of client funds for his own personal use. He was even sued by his law firm partners. 

    While Girardi ultimately went on to being disbarred in California, this caused quite the stir within the legal profession. This is because, despite everything coming to a public head in 2020, the California Board of Bar Examiners had received information and over 200 complaints about Girardi's unethical practices for decades. The Chair of the California Bar Board of Trustees issued a statement on the matter admitting to serious failures and pledging to never let such a situation occur again. 

Meeting the Court's Due Dates: Midnight or End of Business Day?

 The 3rd Circuit has proposed a change to the Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(a) which currently sets the filing deadline for courts as midnight of the day that the filing is due. The 3rd Circuit has proposed changing that deadline to 5 pm, citing to the need for a work life balance of the court staff, as well as the attorneys appearing before the court. 

For the modern attorney, this change has perturbed many who worry about how this may disrupt their office practices and habits. Before the advent of e-filing, filings used to need to stamped as received at 5pm, but in the years since, attorneys have become accustomed to working up until the last minutes of a deadline. For the fast paced work environment that many firms operate within, these extra seven hours are often crucial for providing adequate representation to their clients and meeting the court imposed deadlines.

It is easy to see how changing this rule back to 5pm may help with both the work-life balance of the filing attorneys, and especially for the court staff. However, critics of the change argue that attorneys who regularly practice in other circuits may be caught off guard by the unusual rules in the 3rd Circuit, resulting in missing deadlines that they otherwise could meet.

As future attorneys, do you have strong opinions on whether it is more appropriate for there to be a 5pm or a midnight deadline for filing? How do you think your practice would change based on a change in these rules?

The Work From Home Firing Strategy

After reading the article discussing the firing strategy that Stellantis used to cut jobs, I am left with mixed feelings on their decision. At first, I thought to myself how if I were to get fired from a big company like that myself, that actually may be kind of nice way to get the axe. The morning struggle to get out of the house and to work, only to get fired at who knows when doesn’t sound so great. There is always the chance a boss might wait until the end of the work day to fire an employer, as the article mentioned Elon Musk did when some employers were let go via email after a work day. Surely that would leave anyone with a sour taste in their mouth. Getting fired while you are still in the comfort of your own home while having had a much more stress-free morning sounds better than getting fired after a work day you had to go in for. 

 

However, while this strategy does seem like it may have considered sparing the employers being let go the wasted day going through the motions, it does reveal just how terrifying it can be when employers can be let go in an instant without warning. I imagine if this were to happen in a large law firm, associates would still be enraged and left unhappy with how they were fired out of the blue. Again, I’m sure being at home could improve the distressing event of getting fired maybe only slightly, but the reality of the situation still trumps the WFH firing. That many associates getting let go would naturally lead to many these associates fighting for other job opportunities with one another other. I’m sure there would be a few extra disgruntled associates, so if a large firm were to do this they better hope they did some due diligence and followed the the terms of their employment contracts when letting associates go. 

Recruitment, Inns of Court, and the Stetson Experience

Starting a career in law is an exciting journey filled with a lot of opportunities and pathways. As aspiring legal professionals, it's essential to understand the intricacies of law firm recruitment, the invaluable role that institutions like the Inns of Court play, and the unique perspective offered by institutions like Stetson.

Law firm recruitment is a dynamic process that requires strategic planning, persistence, and a clear understanding of the legal landscape. Whether you are a law student eagerly anticipating graduation or a seasoned professional contemplating a career transition, navigating the recruitment process can be both daunting and exhilarating.

One of the first steps in law firm recruitment is identifying firms that align with your professional goals, values, and areas of interest. Researching the firm's practice areas, client base, culture, and reputation can provide valuable insights into their ethos and suitability for your career aspirations. Additionally, networking with legal professionals, attending career fairs, and leveraging online resources can help you establish connections and uncover hidden opportunities. Stetson in particular offers a lot of opportunities for Networking and connecting with firms. I am actually attending a Networking event after our course gets out today at Trenam law in Tampa. 

In the competitive arena of law firm recruitment, distinguishing yourself from your peers is important. Not only the peers at Stetson, but other law schools. Building a compelling resume that highlights your academic achievements, legal experience, and extracurricular activities can significantly enhance your candidacy. Furthermore, cultivating strong interpersonal skills, honing your legal writing and advocacy abilities, and demonstrating a genuine passion for the law can set you apart as a standout candidate. 

However, securing a position at a prestigious law firm is just the beginning of your journey as a legal practitioner. Once you've embarked on your legal career, ongoing professional development and mentorship are essential for success and fulfillment. This is where institutions like the Inns of Court play a pivotal role, and Stetson offers those connections as well. 

The Inns of Court, is a centuries-old tradition, and serves as esteemed professional associations for barristers and judges in England and Wales. These venerable institutions provide a platform for legal education, networking, and collegiality, fostering the development of ethical, skilled, and principled advocates.

Through advocacy training, moot competitions, lectures, and networking events, the Inns of Court cultivate the next generation of legal talent and instill a sense of camaraderie and duty among members. Moreover, the mentorship and guidance provided by experienced barristers and judges within the Inns' esteemed chambers are invaluable assets for aspiring advocates.

At Stetson, students have the opportunity to immerse themselves in a supportive and collaborative learning environment, where faculty members are not only respected scholars but also dedicated mentors and practitioners. Through experiential learning opportunities, externships, and clinics, students gain real-world experience and develop the confidence and competence to excel in their legal careers.

Law firm recruitment, membership in the Inns of Court, and the Stetson Law experience collectively shape the trajectory of a legal career. By leveraging resources, honing skills, and embracing unique opportunities, aspiring legal professionals can position themselves for success in the competitive legal landscape. Whether your journey leads you to a prestigious law firm, a distinguished chamber of the Inns of Court, or the hallowed halls of Stetson, remember that every step you take contributes to your growth and development as a legal advocate and steward of justice.

Are Contingency fees the best option for law firms?

Per a recent report from Bankrate finds, majority of Americans stated that they would not be able to afford a $1,000 emergency expense. Only 44% of Americans said they would be able to pay for unexpected expenses with savings. How does this effect the average Americans’ access to legal representation? As we know very well, lawyers are not cheap. Based off these statistics, it could be assumed that most Americans do not have the spare cash to put down a retainer fee, or to be able to pay an attorney in an hourly basis. With that being said, it would seem the best option for the modern law firm would be to charge their clients on a contingency basis. A contingency fee is an agreement between the lawyer and client that the lawyer will not be paid any fees unless the case is won. An agreement on the percentage taken by the attorney is decided upon at the beginning of representation. Although there are limitations with this, for example contingency fees cannot be used for criminal or family cases, most cases do have the opportunity to charge this way. What are your thoughts? Are contingency fees the best option for the average American? Can attorneys take advantage of Americans this way? What percentage of winnings is fair for an attorney to take?

Making pro bono mandatory?

     Under the MRPC, lawyers should aspire to complete 50 hours of pro bono work. In Florida, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that lawyers should aspire to 20 hours or $350 in contributions. As these are aspirational standards, they are not mandatory and is not meant to send lawyers into involuntary service. Is this the right take? 

    Some argue that it is a lawyers duty to preform this volunteer work and to give back to their community. The drafters of the model rules stated that every lawyer has a professional responsibility to provide legal services to those that don't pay. I agree with this. However, I think that if there were punishments for not completing a compulsory service, it would take away the meaning behind the pro bono work. It also would force attorneys into compulsory services that could go against constitutional freedoms. Lawyers could also begin to lose the excitement and purpose behind the pro bono service because they feel as though they are forced into it. 

    I think that a possible solution would be for state bar associations to raise the hours of aspirational pro bono service. This would make attorneys feel like they should give free services more, while avoiding imposing mandatory service. 

How law school altered my interest in reading

Before starting law school, I was a pretty big reader. I loved to read a variety of mystery, sci-fi, and romance novels. However, once I began my 1L year and found myself buried in casebooks, my enthusiasm for reading waned. Although reading novels I am interested in is very different from reading boring con law cases, I still had no interest in picking up another book after reading for school all day.

I can't be the only one who's felt this way, right? It seems like law school has this knack for draining the fun out of everything.

But as graduation approaches, I'm starting to see a glimmer of hope. This semester my course load has been a bit lighter and last weekend I bought a new book for the first time in ages. I am hoping that once I'm done with the bar exam, I'll be able to reignite my passion for reading novels. Here's to hoping I can pick up where I left off and dive back into the world of reading for fun.

Judicial Opinions and Sports References

 Douglas E. Abrams, Sports in the Courts: The Role of Sports References in Judicial Opinions, 17 Jeffery S. Moorad Sports L.J. 1 (2010)

I was doing research the other day and came upon this law review article discussing the influence of sports and their references in judicial opinions. As a baseball fan, I have always noted how judges are referred to as umpires and certain other baseball references have made their way into how we talk about the law. In this article, the author runs through sports such as baseball, football, basketball, ice hockey, golf, soccer, track and field, boxing, and horse racing and analyzes how references to these sports have been used in judicial opinions. On the sport of baseball, the author used an example from the 5th circuit in Hoskins v. Wainwright that stated, “We step back into the batter's box, having allowed one to go by us and tipping another, in hopes that on our third and final swing we can avoid a judicial strike-out.” From referring to sports in their judicial opinions to use of baseball terms to refer to stages in litigation, it is interesting to see how judges may incorporate more popular examples into their writing. These may engage with readers more and help them to understand the topics or legal proceedings more thoroughly. If you are interested in seeing how sports have been referred to in judicial opinions, I would recommend skimming this article. Some of the examples are interesting to read about. I am always curious about the intersection of sports and the law and this gives another good example.

Law School Schedules

As I was looking through the Fall schedule and trying to pick out my classes for my 3L fall, I found myself getting overwhelmed with trying to find classes that I wanted to take, while still trying to fulfill credits with classes that are bar tested or would be likely to serve me in my career. Obviously law school is only three years, with one of those years almost completely chosen for students, and another few courses required, leaving students with only so much room to take electives that they want to take purely out of interest. 

I only have two more semesters left and I'm finding that some of the courses I put off until next year I likely will not end up taking because I also need to prioritize other bar-tested courses and bar-prep classes. Not that I wish law school was longer, but I do wish I had more freedom in my schedule to take classes that I think would just be fun, or be able to fill more credits with practical courses, rather than feeling the need to tether myself to a schedule that I'm less interested in, but would benefit more from from a bar standpoint, as well as as general knowledge. 

This also gets more frustrated when many classes conflict with one another, leaving me with even less options. I don't really think there is much that can be done about this, as there are many factors that go into creating a schedule that works for professors and students and taking the more general or heavily-tested courses is very important, but I just wish there was a different way for students to be exposed to some of the interesting topics and seminar classes without overloading on courses or feeling like their not taking the "right classes." 

So.......Anyone Know What Happens Next?

     To all the other 3Ls in the class, let's talk about the elephant in the room: Graduation. Don’t panic, but it is just 53 days away.

    As we’re hurtling toward the end of law school, I can't help but realize something: I've been a student for what feels like forever. I mean, I'm a K-JD, I have been in school since I was a toddler, and I’m not really sure what a world outside of school looks like. It's like I've been living in this bubble, and it's about to burst.

    Sure, I'd love to think that stepping out of this bubble is going to be liberating, but to be realistic, my bar prep course starts just two days after graduation, so it's not like I'm getting a break anytime soon.

    I'm writing this for all of the students there like me, who are staring into the abyss of post-graduation uncertainty. We know the drill: graduation, bar prep, the dreaded bar exam, and then... what? The unknown is scary, no doubt about it. And finding a job? Don't even get me started.

    But you know what? We're in this together. Law school might be a breeding ground for imposter syndrome, but nobody really has it all figured out. We're all just riding this rollercoaster and personally, I think it's only going to get more exciting from here.

    We've got this, everyone! It’s almost over!

(Written with the Help of AI :) )

A Fair Shot... If You Can Afford It?: The Civil Gideon Movement Revisited

       In criminal cases, everyone who faces the risk of actual imprisonment is entitled to legal representation under the 6th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This has been the law of the land since the 1960s from the case Gideon v Wainwright. In study after study, it has been shown representation by counsel results in material differences in the outcomes of legal proceedings for clients vs when they are not represented by counsel. In fact, the primary reasoning behind Gideon was that it is not possible to have due process for someone without representation by counsel because its so fundamental to fairness and equality before the law. 

      The big difference however is that this applies only for criminal cases, where much more is at stake being someone's freedom or in some cases their life vs monetary damages in civil cases. The issue of civil Gideon, being the movement for civil public counsel has come up in an on again off again debate for decades. 

      One area in particular where civil Gideon becomes talked about so much is in the area of landlord-tenant law. Read an article, watch the news, listen to a report and one can hear stories of indigent tenants in eviction court, being forced to represent themselves and not understanding the material issues or procedures to follow. Landlords on the other hand, typically have private counsel specializing in these very issues. The results are predictable, and the questions this raises about how truly equal before the law we as citizens can be has led to more calls for public counsel to be appointed to represent tenants in these proceedings. 

      Public interest law firms and other legal aid societies play an important role in providing legal services in these kinds of proceedings. Like Public defenders in criminal court, it has been shown that indigent tenants represented by attorneys from these organizations do materially better. Issues like rent abatement for repairs or other breaches of legal warranties landlords owe to tenants in particular are substantially more likely to become issues when indigent tenants are represented by counsel. That being said, sometimes these private entities themselves can be overwhelmed by the sheer demand for legal services and can only do so much. That has led to more calls for the state to intervene because they have the capacity to muster the resources to meet the demand, its the willingness of state governments to do so that is another issue. 

      Landlord-tenant disputes are just the most prominent example of the calls for civil Gideon. Other areas of law such as civil rights and family law also draw a lot of attention on the need for civil public counsel to be available indigent civil clients. Regardless of one's ultimate view on the issue, its an important discussion that should be had in the legal profession and society more broadly.